Philosophy
The Paideia philosophy celebrates the fundamental notion that to be fully educated is a lifelong adventure that only begins with an individual’s formal schooling. It is based on the assumption that all human beings are by definition activist learners, capable of a fully humanistic life defined by intellectual growth. Thus, Paideia schools should ultimately be judged by how well they prepare students for a full and active life of the heart and mind.
Watch Engaging Students in Active Learning, an introductory video of Paideia in contemporary American schools.
In 1982, Paideia’s original thinker, philosopher Mortimer Adler, joined with a diverse cadre of educators and intellectuals to form the Paideia Group. Its members charged themselves with the task of defining a list of “Paideia Principles” as a summary of ideas introduced by Adler in his seminal work on American education, The Paideia Proposal. These principles were intended to help shape future efforts to improve schools and classrooms.
The Paideia philosophy gives students lifetime skills. It teaches them how to engage in civil dialogue, think critically, and look at both sides of issues. Because students learn how to agree to disagree, a Paideia school environment is really positive. – Steve Ball
Declaration of Paideia Principles
We, the members of the Paideia Group, hold these truths to be the principles of the Paideia Program:
• that all children can learn;
• that, therefore, they all deserve the same quality of schooling, not just the same quantity;
• that the quality of schooling to which they are entitled is what the wisest parents would wish for their own children, the best education for the best being the best education for all;
• that schooling at its best is preparation for becoming generally educated in the course of a whole lifetime, and that schools should be judged on how well they provide such preparation;
• that the three callings for which schooling should prepare all Americans are, (a) to earn a decent livelihood, (b) to be a good citizen of the nation and the world, and (c) to make a good life for one’s self;
• that the primary cause of genuine learning is the activity of the learner’s own mind, sometimes with the help of a teacher functioning as a secondary and cooperative cause;
• that the three types of teaching that should occur in our schools are didactic teaching of subject matter, coaching that produces the skills of learning, and Socratic questioning in seminar discussion;
• that the results of these three types of teaching should be (a) the acquisition of organized knowledge, (b) the formation of habits of skill in the use of language and mathematics, and (c) the growth of the mind’s understanding of basic ideas and issues;
• that each student’s achievement of these results would be evaluated in terms if that student’s competencies and not solely related to the achievements of other students;
• that the principal of the school should never be a mere administrator, but always a leading teacher who should be cooperatively engaged with the school’s teaching staff in planning, reforming, and reorganizing the school as an educational community;
• that the principal and faculty of a school should themselves be actively engaged in learning;
• that the desire to continue their own learning should be the prime motivation of those who dedicate their lives to the profession of teaching.
—The Paideia Group
As part of The Paideia Proposal, the Paideia Group outlined a comprehensive course of study that incorporates three complementary instructional techniques or columns.
The Three Columns of Instruction:
1. didactic instruction of factual information;
2. intellectual coaching of skills; and
3. seminar discussion of ideas, concepts, and values.

4 Comments
I am considering enrolling my child who will be entering 4th grade to a Paideia school. He is currently in another Magnet school and is a straight A student. He us also accustomed to being to a track system, where he is in the hightest math and reading groups. I understand that the Paideia schools do not have a track system for different levels learning. If this is the case, how do they accomodate kids that are doing work beyond their current grade levels?
paideia–sounds too good to be true. How rare it is to challenge a child into “thinking” and growing from knowledge into wisdom. There’s a real “vocational” school. Yours and everyone’s vocation is to learn how to think in order to be a productive self to family, friends, society and the nation!
I wanted to scroll back in time to reply to Judy’s comment. Not all Paideia schools avoid “tracking” students according to perceived ability. You should explore this question with the specific school that you are considering; it may not be an issue.
i’ve not seen a better methodology yet. paideia might yet be the redemption of public education– if the pols would just keep out of the mix.